Group Processing Evaluation Form
|
|
Evaluator:
Person being evaluated:
Course:
Date:
TOTAL Score:
|
|
Knowledge of Content:
|
|
inadequate
|
acceptable
|
good
|
excellent
|
|
0
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
|
Understanding of content at applied level of thought (gives examples of personal experiences, related background knowledge, and/or future uses of the information in applying the information to real-life situations):
|
|
inadequate
|
acceptable
|
good
|
excellent
|
|
0
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
|
Ability to articulate personal opinions and points of view clearly and accurately:
|
|
inadequate
|
acceptable
|
good
|
excellent
|
|
0
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
|
Ability to defend his/her point of view:
|
|
inadequate
|
acceptable
|
good
|
excellent
|
|
0
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
|
Empathic listening (seeks to understand opposing perspectives before defending his/her own position):
|
|
inadequate
|
acceptable
|
good
|
excellent
|
|
0
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
|
Amount of praise and encouragement given to other team members:
|
|
inadequate
|
acceptable
|
good
|
excellent
|
|
0
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
|
Contributions to the group's discussion:
|
|
inadequate
|
acceptable
|
good
|
excellent
|
|
0
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
|
Ability to refrain from dominating the discussion:
|
|
inadequate
|
acceptable
|
good
|
excellent
|
|
0
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
|
Ability to teach content to team members:
|
|
inadequate
|
acceptable
|
good
|
excellent
|
|
0
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
|
Amount of assistance offered to team members:
|
|
inadequate
|
acceptable
|
good
|
excellent
|
|
0
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
|
Facilitation of the group's movement toward consensus:
|
|
inadequate
|
acceptable
|
good
|
excellent
|
|
0
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
|
Identify at least one strength of this person as a team member:
Make at least one suggestion to this person for improving his/her contributions to the group:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
St. Edward's University
3001 South Congress Avenue
Austin, Texas 78704
512-448-8400
|
|
|
