Gilberto Teixeira (Prof. Doutor FEA/USP)
Constructivism is an approach to teaching and learning based on the premise that cognition (learning) is the result of "mental construction." In other words, students learn by fitting new information together with what they already know. Constructivists believe that learning is affected by the context in which an idea is taught as well as by students' beliefs and attitudes.
Constructivist teaching is based on recent research about the human brain and what is known about how learning occurs. Caine and Caine (1991) suggest that brain-compatible teaching is based on 12 principles:
- "The brain is a parallel processor" (p. 80). It simultaneously processes many different types of information, including thoughts, emotions, and cultural knowledge. Effective teaching employs a variety of learning strategies.
- "Learning engages the entire physiology" (p. 80). Teachers can't address just the intellect.
- "The search for meaning is innate" (p. 81). Effective teaching recognizes that meaning is personal and unique, and that students' understandings are based on their own unique experiences.
- "The search for meaning occurs through 'patterning' " (p. 81). Effective teaching connects isolated ideas and information with global concepts and themes.
- "Emotions are critical to patterning" (p. 82). Learning is influenced by emotions, feelings, and attitudes.
- "The brain processes parts and wholes simultaneously" (p. 83). People have difficulty learning when either parts or wholes are overlooked.
- "Learning involves both focused attention and peripheral perception" (p. 83). Learning is influenced by the environment, culture, and climate.
- "Learning always involves conscious and unconscious processes" (p. 84). Students need time to process 'how' as well as 'what' they've learned.
- "We have at least two different types of memory: a spatial memory system, and a set of systems for rote learning" (p. 85). Teaching that heavily emphasizes rote learning does not promote spatial, experienced learning and can inhibit understanding.
- "We understand and remember best when facts and skills are embedded in natural, spatial memory" (p. 86). Experiential learning is most effective.
- "Learning is enhanced by challenge and inhibited by threat" (p. 86). The classroom climate should be challenging but not threatening to students.
- "Each brain is unique" (p. 87). Teaching must be multifaceted to allow students to express preferences.
REFERENCES
Beane, J. (October, 1991). The middle school: The natural home of the integrated curriculum. Educational Leadership 49(2), 9-13.
Benard, B. (1991, August). Fostering resiliency in kids: Protective factors in the family, school, and community. Portland, OR: Western Center for Drug-Free Schools and Communities.
Caine, R.N., & Caine, G. (1991). Making connections: Teaching and the human brain. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Drake, S. (1993). Planning integrated curriculum: The call to adventure. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Dryfoos, J. (1990). Adolescents at risk: Prevalence and prevention. New York: Oxford University Press.
English, J., & Austin, G. (1989, March). Preventing alcohol and other drug use through curricula: Where we've been and where we're heading. Paper presented at the annual conference of the American Education Research Association, San Francisco, CA.
Fennimore, T.F., & Tinzmann, M.B. (1990). What is a thinking curriculum? [On-line]. Available: http://www.ncrel.org/sdrs/areas/rpl_esys/thinking.htm
Fogarty, R. (1991). The mindful school: How to integrate the curricula. Palatine, IL: IRI/Skylight Publishing.
Gibbs, J. (1986, April). A review of current research and state of the art strategies to prevent and disrupt the use of alcohol and other drugs by children and youth. Lakewood, CO: Prevention Center of Boulder, Colorado.
Gibbs, J., & Bennett, S. (1990). Together we can reduce the risks of alcohol and drug abuse among youth. Seattle, WA: Comprehensive Health Education Foundation.
Hixson, J. (1994). Making the case for integrating prevention and restructuring initiatives. In Student Assistance for the 21st Century (pp. 41-44). Oak Brook, IL: Midwest Regional Center for Drug-Free Schools and Communities.
Jones, B.F., Palinscar, A.S., Ogle, D.S., & Carr, E.G. (1987). Learning and thinking. In Strategic teaching and learning: cognitive instruction in the content areas (pp. 3-32). Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Linquanti, R. (1992). Using community-wide collaboration to foster resiliency in kids: A conceptual framework. San Francisco, CA; Western Regional Center for Drug-Free Schools and Communities, Far West Laboratory for Educational Research and Development.
National Commission on Drug Free Schools. (1990). Toward a drug-free generation: A nation's responsibility. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
North Central Regional Educational Laboratory. (1992). About story 2: Mt. Carmel/Wabash County, Illinois, and its schools. In Schools that work: The research advantage, guidebook 6: Preparing students for drug-free lifestyles (pp.26-27). Oak Brook, IL: Author.
Office of Substance Abuse Prevention, Division of Community Prevention and Training. (1991). Getting it together: Promoting drug-free communities. A resource guide for developing effective youth coalitions. Rockville, MD: Author.
Paul, R., Binker., A., Jensen, K., & Kreklau, H. (1990). Critical thinking handbook: A guide for remodeling lesson plans in language arts, social studies and science. Rohnert Park, CA: Foundation for Critical Thinking.
Pittman, K.J. & Cahill, M. (1991, September). A new vision: Promoting youth development. Paper presented to the House Select Committee on Children, Youth, and Families on September 30, 1991.
Pittman, K.J., & Cahill, M. (1992, January). Youth and caring: The role of youth programs in the development of caring. Paper commissioned by the Lilly Endowment Research Grants Program on Youth and Caring and presented at the Conference on Youth and Caring in February 1992.
Tinzmann, M.D., & Hixson, J. (1992). What does research say about prevention [On-line]. Available: http://www.ncrel.org/sdrs/areas/stw_esys/6prevntn.htm
Tinzmann, M.B., Jones, B.F., Fennimore, T.F., Bakker, J., Fine, C., & Pierce, J. (1990). What is the collaborative classroom? [On-line]. Available: http://www.ncrel.org/sdrs/areas/rpl_esys/collab.htm
Voorhees, C.V., & Burke, S.V. (1995, May). Safe and drug-free schools recognition program: 1994-95 winning school abstracts. Oak Brook, IL: North Central Regional Educational Laboratory.
Western Regional Center for Drug-Free Schools and Communities, Northwest Regional Educational Laboratory. (1991, January). Curriculum infusion. Oak Brook, IL: Midwest Regional Center for Drug-Free Schools and Communities.
Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction. (1992). A guide to curriculum planning in alcohol and other drug abuse prevention programs. Madison, WI: Author.